PRODUCTIVITY DYNAMICS OF STANDS IN CONIFEROUS FORESTS OF MARI TRANS-VOLGA REGION

Юрий Петрович ДЕМАКОВ, Александр Викторович ИСАЕВ, Сергей Александрович ДЕНИСОВ

Abstract


The relevance is conditioned by the need in improvement of sustainability in management of ecological and resource potential of forests achieved with the use of mathematical models of dynamics of productivity of stands. The mathematical models are developed on the regional and typological basis. The goal of the research is to study the regularities of dynamics of productivity of stands in coniferous forests of Mari Trans-Volga region and to reflect them as mathematical models. The forests growing in various hygrotopes of pine forests were the object of this research. E-data base, containing the information about the stands of more than 78 000 stratums with the overall area of 385 184 ha, was the material to analyze. IT solution was used to achieve the targeted task. The IT solution was based on a system statistical analysis of digital information on a personal computer with the use of packages of conventional application software. Results. It is viable to grow pure pine forests in coniferous forests of Mari Trans-Volga region. Pine forests are wide spread and they surpass by far the stands with participation of other species by ecological and economical criteria. The stock of stem wood, its actual stock, and stumpage price increase with the age of stands up to a certain point of time only, then they progressively decline. The functional relation of optimum Y = 100´Х/(а´Х2 – b´Х +c), the parameter values of which are unique for each wood species and various hygrotopes, approaches in the best way. In the stands, where the birch prevails, the high point of these valuation indices comes earlier but the value valuation indices is much lower at the moment. The difference between the stands of pine and birch in dry and bogged coniferous forests is very large. The age of technical maturity of stands when mean annual increment of list price for timber is maximum (stands where pine trees predominate) is  65-70 years in fairly moist and moist coniferous forests, 75 years - in dry coniferous forests, 90 years - in damp forests, 120 years - in bogged forests. The figures for birch groves, growing in fairly moist and moist coniferous forests, are much about the same as for pine forests, but there is some difference for the birch groves growing in dry, damp and bogged coniferous forests. Thus, the age of technical maturity of stands when mean annual increment of list price for timber is maximum (birch groves) is 50 years in dry coniferous forests, 65 years - in damp forests, and 80-85 years - in bogged forests. The nature of growth of stands in height and diameter depends to an extent on the density, the influence of which is often polar in different hygrotopes. Altogether, the growth of influence leads to earlier high point of current annual increment, increase of mean height of trees and decrease of their mean diameter. Conclusion: to study the regularities of growth of stands and to solve the managerial tasks, it is desirable to develop the mathematical models, based on the zone-typological basis, not the bonitet one. The revealed regularities of dynamics of productivity of stands confirmed the conclusions of other researchers in full. Besides, they significantly updated them with qualitative economic and ecological data.


Keywords


mathematic models; pine forests; dynamics; mean annual increment; forest site types

Full Text:

PDF (Russian)

References


Burton P.J., Messier C.M., Smith D.W., Adamowicz W.L. (Editors). Towards Sustainable Man-agement of the Boreal Forest. NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 2003, 1039 p.

Писаренко А. И., Страхов В.В. Лесное хозяйство России: от пользования к управлению. М.: ИД «Юриспруденция», 2004. 552 с.

Демаков Ю. П. Диагностика устойчивости лесных экосистем: методологические и методические аспекты. Йошкар-Ола: Периодика Марий Эл, 2000. 415 с.

Карманова И. В. Математические методы изучения роста и продуктивности растений. М.: Наука, 1976. 223 с.

Кузьмичев В. В. Закономерности роста древостоев. Новосибирск: Наука, 1977. 160 с.

Кузьмичев В. В. Закономерности динамики древостоев. Новосибирск: Наука, 2013. 208 с.

Рогозин М. В., Разин Г.С. Модели динамики и моделирование развития древостоев // Сибирский лесной журнал. 2015. № 2. С. 55-70.

Свалов Н. Н. Моделирование производительности древостоев и теория лесопользования. М.: Лесная промышленность, 1979. 216 с.

Усольцев В. А. Моделирование структуры и динамики фитомассы древостоев. Красноярск: Изд-во Красноярского ун-та, 1985. 191 с.

Система моделей роста и динамики продуктивности лесов России / А.З. Швиденко, Д. Г. Щепащенко, С. Нильсон и др.// Лесное хозяйство. 2003. № 6. С. 34-38.

Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The Increasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models / Thierry Fourcaud, Xiaopeng Zhang, Alexia Stokes et al. //Annals of Botany. 2008. Vol. 101. Issue 8. p. 1053–1063. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn050

Plant Growth Modelling and Applications Plant Growth Modelling and Applications: The In-creasing Importance of Plant Architecture in Growth Models / Fourcaud et al. // Annals of Botany 101: 1053–1063, 2008/ doi:10.1093/aob/mcn050, available online at www.aob.oxfordjournals.org

Jogiste K. Productivity of mixed stands of Norway spruce and birch affected by population dy-namics: a model analysis // Ecological Modelling. 1998. Vol. 106. Issue 1. Pages 77–91.

Bartelink H.H. Effects of stand composition and thinning in mixed-species forests: a modeling approach applied to Douglas-fir and beech //Tree Physiol. 2000. Vol. 20 (5–6). Pp. 399-406.

Курнаев С. Ф. Лесорастительное районирование СССР. М.:Наука, 1973. 201 с.

Агроклиматические ресурсы Марийской АССР / Под ред. С.Ф. Гречканевой и К.И. Марченко. Л.: Гидрометеоиздат, 1972. 108 с.

Демаков Ю. П., Козлова И. А. Математические модели хода роста культур сосны для раз-личных типов леса Марийского Заволжья // Вестник Казанского государственного аграрного университета. 2007. № 2. С. 83–91.

Демаков Ю. П., Денисов С.А. Сложение и динамика породного состава лесов в борах Марийского Заволжья // Вестник Поволжского государственного технологического университета. Сер.: Лес. Экология. Природопользование. 2017. № 3 (35). С. 37-48.

Использование аллометрических зависимостей для оценки фитомассы различных фракций деревьев и моделирования их динамики / Ю.П. Демаков, А.С. Пуряев, В.Л. Черных и др. // Вестник Поволжского государственного техноло-гического университета. Сер.: Лес. Экология. Природопользование. 2015. № 2 (26). С. 19-36.

Демаков Ю. П., Пуряев А.С., Мифтахов Т.Ф. Экономический подход к выбору целевой древесной породы для лесовыращивания в Предкамье Республики Татарстан // Вестник Казанско-го государственного аграрного университета. 2016. № 4 (42). С. 20-27.

Чистяков А.Р., Денисов А.К. Типы леса Марийской АССР. Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное издательство, 1959. 75 с.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.